Privacy in the Era of AI, BCI, and BBI

 

When I wrote Privacy Fantasies back in 2010, it was meant to be a provocation—a thought experiment about a world where privacy collapses under the weight of ubiquitous mind‑reading technology. In that imagined 2210 scenario, a simple wearable called Mind‑X allowed anyone to sense others’ emotions, thoughts, and intentions in real time. Secrets evaporated. Society reverted to a globalised version of the pre‑modern village, where everyone knew everything about everyone else.

I didn’t frame it as dystopia. I framed it as inevitability. Technology would push us there; governance, responsibility, and honesty would help us adapt. “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.” Resistance is futile, so shape the future rather than fear it.

Back then, smartphones and social media were only beginning to nibble at the edges of privacy. The idea of collective openness, almost a shared consciousness, felt like science fiction.

So where are we in 2026?

Closer than I expected in 2010.
But still decades, perhaps centuries away from the full Mind‑X dream.

Yet the building blocks are emerging with startling speed.

The Technical Foundations Are Falling Into Place

1. Mind-reading is no longer science fiction

Modern BCIs can already decode:

• inner speech
• intentions
• emotional states
• even pre‑conscious signals

Some systems achieve ~74% accuracy on imagined sentences. Others translate thoughts into speech for paralyzed individuals almost instantly. AI models reconstruct images and words from brain activity with eerie fidelity.

Early consumer‑leaning devices, Omi’s forehead sensor, Meta’s neural wristbands are crude but unmistakable steps toward everyday neural interfaces.

2. Emotional sensing is accelerating

Non‑invasive tools can detect attention, stress, arousal, and other basic states. This is the first glimmer of the “sense emotions during conversations” capability I imagined in 2010.

3. Brain-to-brain interfaces (BBI) are emerging

We now have small groups sharing simple neural signals. High‑bandwidth implants (Neuralink and its competitors) are scaling rapidly. Telepathic collaboration—at least for willing participants—is no longer fantasy.

Timelines: A Realistic Trajectory

2030s–2040s (10–20 years)

• Consumer BCIs for self‑use
• Opt‑in emotional sharing between couples or teams
• Early BBI networks for specialised groups
• AR glasses with rudimentary “emotion sense”

2050s–2080s (30–60+ years)

• Something approaching Mind‑X
• High‑fidelity passive neural sensing
• AI‑mediated transparency in professional or intimate settings

The full 2210 vision

• Possibly never in its pure form
• Or 100–200 years away
• Not because of technology alone, but because of ethics, law, and human resistance

Many neuroethicists argue that comprehensive, non‑consensual mind access may be physically impossible—or legally forbidden.

The Real Barriers: Ethics, Law, and Human Nature

Neurorights are rising

Chile has already legislated them. The US, EU, and others are debating them. Neural data is being treated as sacred, akin to DNA or fingerprints. Non‑consensual mind‑reading may become the ultimate red line.

Consent will be the cornerstone

Future systems will likely be:

• opt‑in
• granular
• AI‑filtered

Instead of total transparency, we may get enhanced empathy, a softer, more human version of the dream in most parts of the world. With exceptions??

Adaptation is already underway

Just as photography, the internet, and smartphones forced society to renegotiate privacy, neural tech is triggering the next wave of debate. My 2010 “fantasy” is colliding with reality, but with guardrails.

A Glimpse of the Future: My Recent Visit

I recently visited a nearly completed brainstorming centre of a high‑powered agency. At its core sits an AI‑controlled orb, part facilitator, part moderator. Every participant around it is tracked continuously: heart rate, facial expressions, micro‑gestures, body language.

A room where biomarkers become part of the conversation.

Is this transparency?
Is this enhanced collaboration?
Or is this the first step toward institutionalised emotional surveillance?

The answer depends entirely on governance and intent.

Harari’s Warning: A Faster Shift Than We Expect

Listening to Yuval Noah Harari’s recent podcast (By 2030, the World Will Be Unrecognizable), I was struck by his argument that by 2030, the world will be unrecognisable. Not because of gadgets, but because AI will reshape the very foundations of human society, identity, agency, belief systems.

In the context of BCI and BBI, this raises a profound question:
Can individuality survive when thoughts become shareable?

My view: yes, but only through responsibility and design.
We are building tools that could dissolve individuality, but we are also building the governance frameworks that could preserve it.

Where We Actually Stand

We are on the ramp.
The acceleration since 2010 has been extraordinary.
Precursors to the Mind‑X world may emerge in our lifetime, or certainly in our children’s.

But the “village of minds” future remains a distant horizon, shaped as much by values as by technology.

The core insight from 2010 still holds:
We cannot stop this trajectory, but we can steer it.

And the conversation we are having today is exactly the kind of responsible engagement that will determine whether this future empowers humanity, or overwhelms it.

Tail Piece

The truth is this: leaders today are still debating privacy as if we’re in 2010, while the technology has already leapt into 2030. We are entering an era where the human mind becomes a data source, where emotions are measurable, intentions are inferable, and collaboration may soon happen at the speed of thought. And yet most boardrooms are still stuck arguing about cookie banners and data‑sharing policies.

The gap between technological reality and leadership imagination has never been wider.

AI, BCI, and BBI are not “future issues.” They are governance issues, competitive issues, national‑security issues, and societal‑stability issues. The organisations that treat neural data with the same casualness as digital exhaust will face existential backlash. The ones that build guardrails early will define the norms the rest of the world follows.

This is the moment where leadership either evolves, or becomes irrelevant.

Because the next wave of disruption won’t ask for permission.
It won’t wait for regulation.
It won’t pause for ethical debates.

It will simply arrive.

And when it does, the question for leaders will be brutally simple:

Did you shape the future of mental privacy—or did you sleepwalk into it?

 

“We may not stop the merging of minds, but we can still decide what it means to be human.”

India’s Great Tech Leap: How a Once‑Cautious Nation Became the World’s Most Ambitious Innovator

 

For decades, India’s relationship with technology was defined by a paradox.

It produced some of the world’s best engineers, yet lacked the infrastructure to turn that talent into frontier innovation.
It powered global IT services, yet imported the chips that ran its own devices.
It launched spacecraft to Mars, yet struggled to commercialize space technology at scale.

That India is disappearing.

In its place is a nation moving with a speed, confidence, and strategic clarity that has startled even long‑time observers.
Across semiconductors, space, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, and digital public infrastructure, India is executing one of the most aggressive technology expansions anywhere in the world.

This is not a sprint.
It is a systems‑level transformation, and it is reshaping global power equations.

The Silicon Bet: India’s Semiconductor Awakening

For years, India watched the global semiconductor race from the sidelines.
Today, it is building fabs, packaging units, and design ecosystems with a seriousness that signals a long‑term national commitment.

The shift began with a simple realization:
A nation of 1.4 billion cannot depend on imported chips for its economic and strategic future.

India’s semiconductor mission is now in full execution mode.
Multiple OSAT/ATMP facilities are under construction.
Compound semiconductor fabs, critical for EVs, telecom, and power electronics, are moving fastest.
SCL Mohali is being modernized to anchor sovereign chip capability.
And a new generation of chip‑design startups is emerging under the Design Linked Incentive scheme.

India is not chasing 3‑nanometer logic fabs.
It is chasing strategic relevance, entering through niches where global demand is exploding and competition is thin:
power electronics, RF, automotive chips, and advanced packaging.

It is a pragmatic, disciplined, and deeply strategic entry point.

The New Space Power: India’s Quiet Revolution Above the Clouds

If semiconductors are India’s industrial bet, space is its geopolitical one.

In the last two years, India has achieved milestones that place it in an elite club:
in‑orbit satellite docking, terabytes of solar science data from Aditya‑L1, orbital experimental platforms enabling robotics and propulsion tests, and a rapidly expanding private space ecosystem.

The transformation is profound.
India is no longer defined by occasional headline missions.
It is building repeatable, commercial, scalable space infrastructure.

A third launch pad is under development at Sriharikotta .
Reusable launch vehicle tests are accelerating.
A national space station is planned for the 2030s. The Bharatiya Antariksh Station (BAS) is India’s planned indigenous, modular space station, aimed to be operational by 2035 to support long-duration human spaceflight and microgravity research. Developed by ISRO, it will orbit 400–450 km above Earth
Private companies are building propulsion systems, sensors, and small launch vehicles.

India is not just a cost‑efficient spacefaring nation.
It is on the road to becoming a space power, one that can shape markets, standards, and supply chains.

AI at Population Scale: India’s Most Underrated Advantage

While the world debates the ethics and economics of AI, India is quietly building something unique:
AI designed for a billion people.

The National AI Mission is deploying sovereign compute infrastructure at unprecedented scale.
Indian foundational models are emerging across languages, healthcare, agriculture, and governance.
AI‑powered citizen services already reach hundreds of millions of people.

This is India’s superpower:
AI that is not tested in labs, but in the real world, messy, diverse, multilingual, and massive.

India’s AI ecosystem is shifting from services to sovereign capability.
From building models for others to building models for itself.
From being a talent exporter to becoming a platform nation.

Quantum: The Next Frontier of National Power

Quantum technology is often described as the “space race of the 21st century.”
India is determined not to repeat the mistakes of the past, where it entered late and played catch‑up.

The National Quantum Mission is investing heavily in quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum‑secure networks.
City‑to‑city quantum communication links are already being tested.
50–100 qubit systems are in development.
Defence‑grade quantum encryption pilots are underway.

Quantum is not just a scientific pursuit.
It is a national security imperative.
And India is treating it as such.

The Invisible Engine: Digital Public Infrastructure

Behind all these advances lies India’s most powerful and least understood advantage:
Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI).

Aadhaar, UPI, ONDC, DigiLocker, CoWIN, and a growing stack of interoperable digital rails have created a platform for innovation unmatched anywhere in the world.

DPI is India’s operating system.
It enables scale.
It reduces friction.
It democratizes access.
It turns a billion people into a billion participants.

This is the foundation on which India’s tech ambitions stand.

The Pattern: A Nation Building Strategic Depth

Across all these domains chips, space, AI, quantum, DPI, the pattern is unmistakable:

India is building sovereign capability in the technologies that define global power.

Not through slogans.
Not through incrementalism.
But through:

• Massive public investment
• Private sector acceleration
• Global partnerships
• Talent depth
• A national appetite for scale

This is not a collection of initiatives.
It is a coherent national strategy.

The Decade Ahead: India’s Moment of Consequence

India’s next challenge is not ambition.
It is discipline.

The world is recalibrating supply chains, rethinking alliances, and rediscovering the value of trusted partners.
India has a 5–7 year window to cement itself as a global technology anchor.

If India sustains this momentum, it will not just participate in the next technological era.
It will shape it.

And for the first time in its modern history, the world is beginning to believe that India might actually do it.

 “Every nation has a moment when it decides who it wants to be. India has chosen to be consequential.”

Entrepreneurs Start Companies. Bureaucrats End Them

 

When companies are born, they rarely begin with grand org charts, multilayered governance structures, or 200‑page SOP manuals. They begin with a handful of people who are hungry, restless, and unafraid to get their hands dirty. People who don’t wait for permission. People who learn by doing, not by presenting. People who care about purpose, outcomes, and value, not optics, credits, or turf.

These early teams are made of Doers in the truest sense of the word. They take responsibility. They deliver. They improvise. They experiment. They fail fast and recover faster. They don’t hide behind process because there is no process to hide behind. They don’t obsess over structure because the only structure that matters is the one that gets the job done.

This is the spirit that births companies.
This is the spirit that builds movements.
This is the spirit that creates impact.

And then… scale arrives.

And with scale comes the inevitable: systems, processes, governance, measurement, compliance, and the dreaded bean‑counting. None of this is inherently bad. In fact, without these, organisations collapse under their own weight. Stability matters. Accountability matters. Repeatability matters.

But here’s the tragedy:
When the pendulum swings too far toward process, the organisation forgets why it exists.

The machinery becomes more important than the mission.
The rituals become more important than the results.
The compliance becomes more important than the customer.

And in this slow drift from purpose to process, a new species emerges inside the organisation, the Passenger.

The Rise of the Passenger

The Passenger is not incompetent. In fact, they are often articulate, polished, and excellent at navigating internal systems. They know how to write long emails, how to attend meetings, how to escalate, how to cover themselves, and how to stay “aligned.”

But they are not builders.
They are not creators.
They are not owners.

They are more invested in the machinery than the mission. They optimise for internal perception rather than external impact. They care more about credits than outcomes. They follow the rulebook even when the rulebook is outdated. They prioritise safety over speed, predictability over possibility, and optics over ownership.

Passengers don’t kill organisations overnight.
They kill them slowly, by draining the entrepreneurial spirit that once made the organisation alive.

And once Passengers dominate, the Doers either leave or get suffocated. That is the beginning of the end.

The Balance That Determines Survival

Every organisation eventually faces a fundamental question:

How do we preserve the entrepreneurial spirit while building the systems needed for scale?

This balance, or the lack of it, determines whether a company evolves or perishes.

The good news is that many large companies have found a way to keep innovation alive. When they want to open new growth avenues, they carve out a crack team — a small, empowered, entrepreneurial unit with the freedom to experiment, break rules, and move fast. A team that is intentionally kept away from the bureaucratic machinery.

This team is given:

• A mandate to think differently
• Freedom from the shackles of BAU
• Permission to experiment
• A leader who believes in speed, risk, and disruption

And once this team gains momentum, the mainstream organisation absorbs the learnings and scales the success.

But here’s the catch, and it’s a big one:

If this crack team reports to a BAU leader, the experiment is dead on arrival.

Because BAU leaders optimise for stability, predictability, and risk minimisation. They are not wired for entrepreneurial chaos. They don’t understand the value of a quick strike. They want plans, frameworks, decks, committees, and alignment before taking the first step.

That is how innovation dies, not because the idea was bad, but because the environment was hostile.

A Real Story: How Bureaucracy Kills Momentum

Recently, a company I know attempted such an experiment. They onboarded an entrepreneurial, high‑energy individual from outside , someone with the mindset of a commando, not a clerk. His mandate: open a new geography with massive potential.

He did exactly what a hunter would do.
He identified a powerful early linkage.
He moved fast.
He reached out to the leadership with excitement.

And then came the response, from a leader who had never been required to think like an entrepreneur. Someone steeped in the classic bureaucratic “CYA” culture.

The reply was a masterpiece of corporate paralysis:

“I appreciate your initiative in meeting people in this new territory, but for us to engage effectively, we need context, a structured plan, and alignment on what we are jointly looking to achieve. Without that, it becomes difficult for us to prioritise or commit resources, especially when nothing concrete has been outlined yet. Let us spend another four months studying the market and evolve a detailed implementation plan and then start.”

Brilliantly articulated.
Perfectly structured.
And absolutely spirit‑killing.

This is how you pour cold water on a go‑getter.
This is how you suffocate initiative.
This is how you turn a commando into a clerk.

Is the leader wrong?
Not entirely. Planning matters. Context matters. Alignment matters.

But this is not how hunters operate.
A hunter’s mindset is about the surgical strike , a quick, sharp opening salvo that creates early momentum while the larger plan evolves in parallel.

When the world is moving at breakneck speed, waiting four months to “study the market” is not strategy. It is self‑sabotage.

The World Has Changed. Many Organisations Haven’t.

We live in an era where industries are being disrupted in real time. New technologies, new behaviours, new competitors, everything is shifting faster than traditional organisations can comprehend.

In such a world, the companies that survive will be the ones that can:

• Experiment fast
• Learn fast
• Adapt fast
• Scale fast

The ones that cling to old models of planning, alignment, and risk‑avoidance will become irrelevant. They will become dinosaurs, large, impressive, and extinct.

The irony is that many organisations talk endlessly about innovation, agility, and transformation. They put these words in their annual reports, their town halls, their strategy decks.

But when a real entrepreneur walks in and tries to do something bold, the system reacts like an immune response, attacking the very thing that could save it.

The Choice Every Leader Must Make

Every leader, especially those running established businesses, must ask themselves a brutally honest question:

Do I want Doers or Passengers?
Doers disrupt the status quo.
Passengers defend it.

Doers take risks.
Passengers avoid them.

Doers create value.
Passengers create paperwork.

If you want innovation, you must protect the Doers.
If you want stability, you will attract Passengers.
If you want longevity, you must balance both, but never let the Passengers dominate.

The future belongs to organisations that can institutionalise entrepreneurship without descending into chaos. That can build systems without killing spirit. That can scale without suffocating initiative.

This is not easy.
But it is necessary.

Because in a world that is changing this fast, the companies that fail to metamorphose will not get a second chance.

They will simply disappear.

“The future belongs to the organisations that can reinvent themselves before the world forces them to.”